
Back when Kawasaki were
in their infancy and the British big twins had the world market
by the gonads, Kawi decided it was time to get serious about motorcycles
and build a big air cooled twin of its own. Following the age
old rule of why develop when you can simply copy, the W1 was born.
Based on the BSA A10, it sold well in the home market but not
in North America.
![]() |
Kawasaki W1 650, a blatant copy of the BSA A10 which Kawasaki inherited when they took over the Meguro concern. |
Kawasaki quickly ceased production
of the big twin, that is until a decade later when the twin cam
Z750 was introduced. However, Lady Fortune was not rubbing up
against Kawasaki, and the KZ750 was quickly condemned as one of
the most character less and boring bikes ever made.
That brings us to the present, 20 years since the Z750 and 30
since the W1, where we find that the big K has decided to re-explore
this concept with the W650

With my own personal fondness of big parallel twins, I'd kept
my eye on the W650 as it hit the pages of the mags, and when the
chance came to have a go myself, I jumped .. well rode, and picked
it up.
Initial viewing reveals close attention to all things retroness.
Spoked wheels (19" front and 18" rear) with narrow tires,
air cooled parallel twin motor, drum rear brake and even fork
gaiters, speak of 40 years gone by. The styling is uncannily 60's,
yet with a modern attention to detail and the desirable injection
of 90's technology.
The motor is the traditional 676cc parallel twin that proved so popular in the sixties, with electric boot and ... wait for it ... a kick starter! Even the crank layout is of the 360 degree format (pistons up and down together), with a long 83 mm stroked crank, heavy flywheel and a single camshaft (thankfully overhead though). Where things get a little odd are in the cam drive department. Pushrods? Camchain? No, how about a shaft. I'm not critisising, it's a well engineered (if rather expensive) way of transmitting the drive. Oh, but that external cam drive does means that the spark plugs are missing. Well, just not where you'd expect them because the shaft gets in the way. They're actually up front, right on the top of the engine. Max claimed horsepower is around 50, with max torque coming in at a tad over 40 ft.lb at 5500 rpm.
|
Top: Spark plug location
Left: Bevel drive
Right: Kick starter |
![]() |
As a happy owner of a 1976 Yamaha XS650, I thought it would be
interesting to grab a days ride with both bikes - new verses old
kinda thing. So it was that photographer Wilfred Gaube and myself
headed north on the two thumpers.
Initially, the W650 didn't quite fit my 6'4" carcass, even
though the seat is a tall 800 mm. The thick rubber knee pads on
the tank didn't pad my knees, but rubbed against my legs. The
bars seem to be lifted directly off an over emphasised cruiser
- leaving the rider upright with arms splayed to the wind, and
the seat just felt, 'ard! But then I started to adapt. With pegs
directly under the rider, it's easy to shuffle your upper body
about to maintain comfort. Higher speeds still suffered due to
the bars, but a set of flatter, narrower bars would seem like
a relatively simple mod to get you leaning slightly forward and
into the wind. Failing that, switching to the rear pegs has a
similar effect and is recommended once speeds get above the 120
km/h mark.
This would seem like a good time to talk about vibes. Any twin that throws two chunky pistons up and down together is asking for vibes. My old XS countered this by rubber mounting everything EXCEPT the engine. Kawi take a bit more of a sensible approach by installing a single balancer shaft along with copious rubber mounting between said motor and chassis. Some vibes are still there, which adds to the charm, but thankfully no where near as charming as the XS, which at higher revs charms the fillings from your teeth and all feeling from your extremities. Having said that, a few vibes do persist with the Kawi, which some might find a bit intrusive on the highway.
|
|
Engine cutaway shows both pistons at TDC. Oh, and there's eight valves in that head as well.
Silencers are very '69 Bonnie. |
![]() |
On the Highway, the motor copes very well, eventually running
out of steam around the 180 Km/h mark, although interestingly
you could probably find a few extra Km/h's if you dropped it down
one from top. Talking of which, the box never missed a shift and
was smooth and positive. Even the clutch action was pleasingly
light. FYI, at 180 in top the tach is touching 6,100 rpm - for
the more cautious amoung you, that translates to about 3,400 rpm
at 100 Km/h.
The chassis is also faithful to
the era, made up of a duplex cradle steel frame, sprung at the
rear by twin shrouded shocks (preload only) and non adjustable
telescopic jobbies up front. The resulting handling is not too
bad, although there's a certain amount of vagueness there, especially
at high speed due to the overall softness of the suspension. However,
if you give it some faith into the corners it holds its line well.
Stoppers have thankfully opted for some 90's tech - at the all
important front anyway. The twin sliding caliper grips onto a
300 mm semi floating disc and never left me wanting. Of course
it never left me in a stoppie either, which is good because those
39 mm front forks would likely just bend under the strain. The
rear keeps retro and uses the old drum type. Which isn't that
bad of an idea because too much rear power only results in easy
rear wheel lock ups anyway. Ah, it does the job.
![]() |
W650 likes ditches and all things odd |
At one point of our ride, I thought
it would work well if we got a couple of shots of the W650 doing
a bit of dirt spitting, back wheel spinning, flat track style
maneuvers. The low down torque just encourages this kind of behavior
whenever starting up on the dirt shoulder after a quick map check.
A few miles down the road we came to the required patch o' dirt
and duly snapped away. It was then that I realised that the W650
could not only kick around very happily in the dirt, but also
go in and out of ditches with remarkable ease. The bars weren't
quite right for prolonged standing, but the motor and good ground
clearance open up all kind of minor off road excursions. Later,
we further explored this possibility by taking some of the more
challenging dirt roads, all of which the W650 took in it's stride.
Could we possibly see a scrambler version with high upswept exhaust,
longer suspenders and some semi-knobbies? Probably not, but trust
me, it would work.
So with all that said, what category does this motorcycle fit
into and who would buy it? Somehow, I keep erring more towards
the cruiser market than the sports. Maybe it's the wide bars and
relative disregard for technology. But then it also encourages
the more reckless element of the soul. You don't necessarily just
want to sit back and enjoy the ride, you want to push the ride
a little, without going all the way and actually getting your
knee down
| New (left) and old (right). The W650 and XS650 sow the similar styling cues. |
![]() |
I think there's two groups
that it would appeal to. The more obvious is the 40 plus rider,
who harks back fondly to the originals yet could do without the
grief. And then the rider like me. Turned off by the impractability
of both the podgy cruiser or fanatic sport bike and yearning for
something simple, economic (21 km/l), easy to maintain and yet
capable of doing most things that make riding fun. In Japan, where
the W650 is also available, there's now a big aftermaket market
choice of bolt-ons. It's basic design allows the owner ample room
to modify to their likings. I like that.
Rob Harris